Warning Signs In An Interview That There Could Be A Management Maturity Issue

by Jeremy Berriault | Jan 19, 2021

A couple of weeks ago, a former colleague reached out for some advice about job interviews. After catching up on life, we dove into her recent interview experiences. She was in the midst of a job search, having thoroughly prepped, researching companies, tailoring her resume, and getting her mindset right. On paper, she was doing everything right.
But as we walked through the actual interviews, some red flags started to appear—not with her preparation or answers, but with the interviewers themselves.

The “Checklist” Trap

In one interview, she was given a dummy project scenario and asked to develop a plan in just five minutes. The problem? The information provided was incomplete and inconsistent, leaving her to make numerous assumptions. She did her best and presented a solid recovery plan, but the feedback was that her answers didn’t match the “expected” ones. The interviewers seemed to be looking for specific keywords or phrases, not thoughtful analysis or creative problem-solving.
This kind of rigid, checklist-based approach to interviewing is a missed opportunity. In my own experience managing teams and hiring talent, I’ve always looked for more than just the “right” words—I want to see how candidates think, how they handle ambiguity, and how they collaborate. A binary checklist may be easy to use, but it risks overlooking great talent who bring diverse perspectives.

Oddball Questions and Mixed Messages

In another interview, she faced a brainteaser: “How many feet of garden hose are sold in the U.S. each year?” The interviewer said, “I don’t care what your answer is, I want to see how you get there.” While these questions are meant to test problem-solving, the delivery felt off, as if the process was more about tripping her up than understanding her approach.
She was also asked about handling a release that was at risk of missing its deadline. Her answer was spot-on: assess the risks, communicate transparently with leadership, and make a data-driven recommendation. But when pressed further, it became clear the interviewers were looking for someone to blame if things went wrong—rather than someone who could actually solve problems.

Disrespectful Interactions

The final straw was a simple question: “What are your three proudest moments?” She answered, only to be told, “I don’t care what you answered.” That kind of dismissiveness is not only unprofessional, it’s damaging. If that’s how they treat candidates, how do they treat their employees?

What These Interviews Reveal

These experiences highlight a maturity gap in some organizations’ hiring practices. Overly strict checklists and disrespectful questioning don’t just deter strong candidates—they signal deeper issues within company culture and management. If an organization can’t respect a candidate in the interview process, it’s unlikely they’ll foster a supportive environment for their employees.
Luckily, my colleague landed a role at a company that values and respects its people, and she’s thriving in her new environment.
Remember: Our Breakthrough Calls aren’t just for tackling agile, QA, or SDLC challenges—they’re also a space for career questions and advice. If you’re navigating career decisions or want to talk about interview strategies, let’s connect.